Ponte Academic Journal Dec 2016, Volume 72, Issue 12 |
MANAGEMENT OF TEACHING FROM A STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVE: THE CASE OF A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS IN CHILE Author(s): Francisco Ganga Contreras ,Marcelo Munoz Quezada, Ana Codjambassis Schnettler, Lorena Cosmelli Rojas J. Ponte - Dec 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 12 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.12.39 Abstract: The incorporation of planning instruments, in addition to Quality Assurance instruments (QA), and the paradigm shift on teaching and learning models in Higher Education Institutions throughout the last two decades, has been changing ways of management both in Chilean and Ibero-american universities. Considering these elements, this work pretends to demonstrate how this new reality has influence in the inner management of the university, briefly illustrating the work made at a Chilean university campus in regards to teaching management area. To achieve this goal, a case study will be presented in the form of an “organizational practice” (systematization of the experience), and it will try to reveal the difficulties confronted to implement teaching management actions, stating how the capability of installing a management instrument contributes in the improvement of efficiency standards and helps the achievement of the institution’s goals. Its consequence is the establishment of an assurance culture in regards to quality, related to an essential area of Universitys duty.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |