Ponte Academic Journal Dec 2016, Volume 72, Issue 12 |
DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A DETOX ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR WOMEN: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY Author(s): Mi Ryeong Song ,Yoon Shin Lee J. Ponte - Dec 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 12 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.12.31 Abstract: The methodological study was conducted to develop a detox assessment tool for women. Through a literature review, discussions, and consultations, the researchers determined that detoxification comprises diet, exercise, physical symptoms, life habits, the environment, and mental health. These six categories in the preliminary questionnaire were measured using 60 items. A panel verified the content validity of the 60 items; ultimately, 42 items were selected. A factor analysis of data collected from 155 subjects to identify construct validity yielded 22 items with factor loadings of 62.4% that should be included in the final version of the tool. The tool with 22 items in four categories—diet, physical symptoms, exercise, and life habits and environment—was developed. The results of the criterion validity analysis indicated that free radicals were significantly correlated with the total scores of the detox assessment tool. Detox assessment scores were significantly higher in the group with free radical levels above 1000. There were significant differences in detox assessment scores according to age, economic status, operation and chemotherapy, and free radical levels.The researchers suggest a follow-up study that applies thedetox assessment tool for women. Detox interventions should be implemented for women who have a higher detox assessment score.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |