Ponte Academic Journal Sep 2017, Volume 73, Issue 9 |
DETERMINATION OF ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTIONS OF SELF-EFFICACY OF TEACHERS USING LCD PANEL INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS Author(s): Erinc Ercag ,Olkan Betoncu J. Ponte - Sep 2017 - Volume 73 - Issue 9 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.9.37 Abstract: The aim of this research is to determine the attitudes and Perceptions of Self-Efficacy of teachers working with LCD Interaction Whiteboard technologies in the regular Secondary Schools and Vocational Technical Schools in Northern Cyprus. The research is a descriptive survey. A total of 371 teachers participated from 38 schools during the 2015-2016 academic year in North Cyprus. Two different scales were used to measure teachers' attitudes and self-efficacy perception levels. T-test, Kruskal Wallis test, Mann Whitney U test, mean and correlation analysis were applied during the analysis of the research data. The result of the research found that the teachers' attitudes toward interactive Whiteboard usage and Perceptions of Self-Efficacy were high. It was determined that there were statistically significant correlations between the score of teachers' attitude toward LCD interactive whiteboard usage scale and scores of interactive Whiteboard usage and self-efficacy scale.
Similarly, there were statistically significant, strong and positive correlations between all of the sub-dimensions in teachers' self-efficacy scale for interactive Whiteboard usage.
Key words: Interactive Whiteboard, North Cyprus, Teacher, Attitude, Self-efficacy
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |