Ponte Academic Journal Mar 2019, Volume 75, Issue 3 |
DETERMINATION OF SULPHUR AND ASH CONTENTS IN THE COAL BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE METHOD Author(s): Baimolda D. ,Cechak T., Yerzhenbek B, Tlebaev K.B. J. Ponte - Mar 2019 - Volume 75 - Issue 3 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2019.3.8 Abstract: Coal is a very heterogeneous solid originating mainly from plant material. Coal is a major source of energy and its quality also depends on its elemental composition. Some elements present in coal can be environmentally hazardous when the coal is burned. In recent years, in the countries using a coal as the main source of energy the issue in the field of environment and ecology has become much stronger than in previous years. The international community began to demand tough measures in the field of non-proliferation of air pollution from the combustion of coal carbon dioxide and other toxic gases in the air. In this case, along with the determination of physical and chemical properties of coal and coal ash, there are quickly need to identify some hazardous elements as sulphur, titan and ash that is harmful to the environment. To fulfill such demands and needs recent years have seen rapid developments and applications of x-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques in the coal industry. This study concerns sulphur and ash contents of coal samples from Mongolia and Czech Republic by using XRF, which offers several unique advantages over other analytical methods.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |