Ponte Academic Journal Jun 2016, Volume 72, Issue 6 |
THE DIVERSITY BIOCENOTIC OF PALME GROVE, AN INDICATOR OF ITS STATE OF DEGRADATION Author(s): Benameur Saggou Hayet ,Idder mohamed Azzedine, Chellofi Hamid, Idder-Ighili Hakima J. Ponte - Jun 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 6 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.6.25 Abstract: The palm grove is a great ensemble of ph�nicicols gardens, as different from each other. Each orchard has its particular characteristics, as floristically that faunal.
We are witnessing in previous decades to continual degradation of ecosystems "palm grove" whose main cause is anthropogenic. Our study would be to protect non-functional biotopes, based on biological indices. Thus, we generally distinguish maintained orchards, moderately maintained and non-maintained. The diagnosis of a biotope health status was assessed through its biocenotic composition. Significant differences both from the point of view floristic that faunistic were identified by comparing two ph�nicicol environments; one maintained grouping 33 floristic species and 45 faunistic species, other non-maintained with 13 plant species and 17 faunistic species. Floristic richness increased the number of trophic categories of which 11 are registered in maintained environment.
We stipulate that the biocenosis present in an environment can be a source of information on the state of an ecosystem and its functioning.
Keywords: Palm grove, fauna, flora, trophic regime, biological balance.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |