Ponte Academic Journal Sep 2019, Volume 75, Issue 9 |
BADMINTON SKILL: THE INFLUENCE TEACHING STYLE AND MOTOR EDUCABILITY Author(s): Ashadi Cahyadi ,Herman Subarjah, Yunyun Yudiana, Yusuf Hidayat J. Ponte - Sep 2019 - Volume 75 - Issue 9 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2019.9.10 Abstract: This study aims to see the Influence teaching style and motor educability on badminton skills. The research method used the Experimental. The design of this study 2 x 2 Factorial Design. This research was conducted in Junior High School in Pontianak. Study participants numbered 60 students (Men: 40 and Women: 20). The instrument in this study uses motor educability tests and badminton skills tests. Data analysis used one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA. gain comparison of the experimental group of command and divergen teaching styles was obtained TCount > TTable (4.233 > 1.671). differences in the style of teaching command and divergen of high and low motor educability. shows that FCount > FTable (119.61 > 4.20) for high motor educability while low motor educability are FCount > FTable (4,840 > 4,20). there is an influence between teaching style and motor educability on the badminton skills was obtained by the value of FCount > FTable (53,617 > 4,20. Overall there is an influence of teaching style and motor educability on badminton skills.\r\nKeywords: Command Teaching Style, Divergen Teaching Style, Motor Educability, Badminton Skill
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |