Ponte Academic Journal Jan 2019, Volume 75, Issue 1 |
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT IN THE TREATMENT OF SINGLE GINGIVAL RECESSION DEFECTS OF PATIENTS WITH THIN GINGIVAL BIOTYPE Author(s): Eylem Ayhan Alkan J. Ponte - Jan 2019 - Volume 75 - Issue 1 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2019.1.2 Abstract: Objectives: The connective tissue graft (CTG) is considered to be the most performed procedure in the treatment of gingival recession defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of (CTG) in the treatment of Miller class I and II single gingival recession defects of patients with thin gingival biotype.Material and methods: 14 systemically healthy patients (8 females and 6 males); aged 30 to 55 years were treated. The clinical parameters plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), gingival thickness (GT), probing depth (PD), recession height (RH), recession width (RW), and amount of attached gingiva (AG) were recorded at baseline and re-measured at 6 months. Results: CTG procedure resulted in statistically significant decreases in PD, RH, RW, and increases in AG at 6 months (p<0.05). There was also a significant gain in the CAL (p<0.05). The mean percentage root coverage at the final evaluation was 95%.Conclusion: Within the limits of present study it can be concluded that CTG has favourable results in the treatment of Miller Class I and II single gingival recession defects of patients with thin gingival biotype.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |