Ponte Academic Journal Sep 2019, Volume 75, Issue 9 |
ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPANT SATIFACTION LEVEL TOWARD ECDIS TRAINING SERVICES AND FACILITIES Author(s): Dr. Sarifuddin ,Yustina Sapan, Andy Wahyu Hermanto J. Ponte - Sep 2019 - Volume 75 - Issue 9 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2019.9.2 Abstract: Based on the 2010 Amendments on STCW (Standards Training of Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers), in Chapter II, at the operational and management level, it is mandated thatcommercial vessel�s deck officers are obliged to take part in ECDIS (Electronic Chart Display and Information System) training in aapproved training and education institutions.This research was aimed to (1) identify and analyze the effect of service quality (tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy) toward the participant satisfaction on ECDIS training in SMPP (Semarang Merchant Marrine Polytechnic), (2) to determine the most dominant variable among the five (tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy) toward the participant satisfaction on ECDIS training in SMPP. Based on the analysis, in regard to participant satisfaction level toward the implementation of ECDIS training in PIP Semarang, it was found that 4% of participants were very satisfied by the services, 40% of them were satisfied, 42% of them rated the service as moderate, 13% of them were disatisfied, and 1% of the participants were very disatisfied.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |