Ponte Academic Journal Oct 2015, Volume 71, Issue 10 |
IMPROVEMENT IN QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY IN AN ENDOSCOPY UNIT - COMPLETION OF THE AUDIT CYCLE Author(s): N. Bullen, C. Challend, J, Lawrence, K. Hosie J. Ponte - Oct 2015 - Volume 71 - Issue 10 Abstract: Introduction The Darzi Report states seven steps are required to maintain and achieve high quality standards in the NHS. This
includes measurement of clinical performance as a function of quality and cost-effectiveness. Reproducible performance models
may be helpful in developing quality improvement processes. Methods Analysis of all endoscopy procedures performed at
Derriford Hospital between January 2007 ? December 2008. Points allocation:two per colonoscopy and one per gastroscopy.
Local health economic analysis revealed that ?8 points must be performed to meet costs. Following analysis individualised
feedback was given to each endoscopist on their performance and areas for improvement. The audit cycle was completed
over the next year. Results In total, 4069 colonoscopies were performed (cf. 3884 in 2007). There was improvement in both
crude Caecal Intubation Rate (CIR) from 89.6% (2007) to 91.1% (2008), and Points/List from 8.0 (2007) to 8.4 (2008). ?Clinical
Performance? was compared by plotting a capability index of individual crude CIRs against Points/List. The improvement in
Points/List equates to an increase in unit profitability of greater than 300,000 pounds. There was reduction in training opportunities
possibly due to introduction of the National Bowel Screening Programme. Conclusion Introduction of auditable performance
measurements has dramatically improved both quality and productivity of our endoscopy unit.
Take-home message: A method of improving the quality and cost effectiveness of an endoscopy unit.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |