Ponte Academic Journal May 2017, Volume 73, Issue 5 |
EXPLORING SOUTH AFRICAN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MATHEMATICS PEDAGOGIC STRATEGIES Author(s): Jayaluxmi Naidoo J. Ponte - May 2017 - Volume 73 - Issue 5 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.5.29 Abstract: Currently, research focusing on pre-service teachers’ perceptions and knowledge of pedagogic strategies for mathematics is limited. To respond to this limitation, this qualitative study was located within an interpretive paradigm and aimed to explore pre-service teachers’ perceptions of pedagogic strategies for the teaching of mathematics. The study was framed within the ambit of social constructivism and Shulman’s teacher knowledge model, focusing on teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Each of the 32 participants in the main study was asked to complete two questionnaires at subsequent stages within the research process. Consequently, participants were invited to participate in semi-structured individual interviews. All 32 participants that participated in the main study were interviewed. The findings demonstrate that pre-service teachers are aware of the pedagogic strategies employed in mathematics classrooms, but they have difficulty in transforming this knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. The findings may be of importance to mathematics teachers, mathematics teacher educators and researchers within the field.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |