Ponte Academic Journal Oct 2021, Volume 77, Issue 10 |
FITNESS FOR PURPOSE: PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHERS AND SCHOOL MANAGEMENT TEAMS ON SCHOOL MANAGEMENT TEAMS’ TEACHER SUPERVISION ATTENTIVENESS Author(s): Israel Kariyana ,Reynold A Sonn, Neziwe Mapangwana J. Ponte - Oct 2021 - Volume 77 - Issue 10 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2021.10.8 Abstract: The study sought to solicit school management teams (SMTs) and teachers’ contextual understanding of teacher supervision in schools. A convergent parallel research design within a mixed-method approach was utilised. The sample comprised 16 SMT members and 48 teachers. A structured questionnaire and a semi-structured interview schedule were utilised to gather data. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 23 while content analysis was used to thematically analyse qualitative data. Findings revealed that teachers and SMTs held different views about the concept teacher supervision and there was no consistency regarding the elements that needed to be supervised, as well as the degree to which such elements were to be supervised. Most supervision aspects were never or were sometimes supervised in schools. The study concluded that though teachers and SMTs held inconsistent views and interpretation about the concept teacher supervision, SMTs were not competently carrying out teacher supervision partly due to deficient subject pedagogic and content knowledge and skills. The study recommends the need for SMTs to implement thorough supervision and ensure that supervision must not always be formal as literature posits that informal supervision effectively complements formal supervision.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |