Ponte Academic Journal Nov 2018, Volume 74, Issue 11 |
THE ROLE OF NATIONAL STYLE IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS ON THE EXAMPLE OF RUSSIA AND CHINA Author(s): Tatyana Gennadievna Furman J. Ponte - Nov 2018 - Volume 74 - Issue 11 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2018.11.12 Abstract: Each nation has its own customs, traditions, culture and manner of communication, its own peculiarities of the state and political system. This, of course, has a certain impact on the conduct of negotiations. The debate about whether there is such a thing as a national negotiating style has been going on for a long time. An authoritative domestic researcher of the negotiation process and political settlement, M. M. Lebedeva argues that "direct participants in the negotiations always emphasize the fact of differences in the nature of negotiations between representatives of different countries and peoples". However, the phenomenon of "national style" is still very unclear to international researchers in the field of negotiations, and it seems impossible to give any clear definition. Difficulties in the scientific definition of this term are connected to a large extent with the fact that it is sometimes difficult to draw a clear boundary between the national characteristics of the behavior of the participants in the negotiations, the state style, ethnic and personal characteristics, the specifics of the political culture of representatives of different States, etc.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |