Ponte Academic Journal May 2016, Volume 72, Issue 5 |
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POWERBASES USED BY SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND TEACHERS’ ORGANISATIONAL CYNICISM BEHAVIOURS Author(s): Vural Hosgorur J. Ponte - May 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 5 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.5.28 Abstract: This study aims to determine the relationship between bases of power used by school administrators and teachers’ organisational cynicism behaviours. Designed using the survey model, participants of this study are 302 teachers in the Menteşe district of Muğla province in Turkey within the 2013-2014 academic year. Data was collected using the Bases of Power Used by School Administrators Scale, and the Organisational Cynicism Scale. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. The findings indicate that school administrators mostly use their power of expertise in management. Teachers develop a medium level of behavioural cynicism at school. No significant difference was found between cynicism dimensions in terms of gender. Nonetheless, there was found significant difference among teachers’ opinions regarding the reward dimension of the powerbases used by school administrators. Additionally, significant differences were determined both at power dimensions and at cynicism dimensions from the perspective of school type and seniority. Power resources used by school administrators explain approximately 11% of teachers’ cognitive cynicism variance. Analysis conducted to determine significance of regression coefficients showed that legitimate power of school administrator predicted cognitive cynicism scores of the teachers.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |