Ponte Academic Journal Nov 2017, Volume 73, Issue 11 |
WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN AN ACADEMIC WRITING CLASSROOM: HOW DO TEACHERS MATCH THEIR BELIEFS WITH STUDENTS PREFERENCES? Author(s): Hlaviso A. Motlhaka ,Ernest K. Klu J. Ponte - Nov 2017 - Volume 73 - Issue 11 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.11.17 Abstract: This study investigated teachers beliefs and students’ preferences on Written Corrective Feedback (WCF). Qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 6 (n=6) pre-service teachers in their first-year of a four-year Bachelor of Education (BEd) degree programme and 2 (n=2) ESL teachers who taught academic writing to BEd students. WCF is found to help L2 writers to notice language patterns and errors as well as language models to improve their writing as an effective writing pedagogical practice. The study found that teachers believe that the use of WCF remedies students’ weaknesses in grammar, vocabulary and lack of brainstorming ideas.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |