Ponte Academic Journal Sep 2017, Volume 73, Issue 9 |
SPECIFIC FEATURES AND CLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT-PREDICATIVE SENTENCES (BASED ON THE CHINESE AND KAZAKH LANGUAGES) Author(s): Dinara Dauyen ,Nurhalyk Abdurakyn, Gulzhamal Kortabayeva J. Ponte - Sep 2017 - Volume 73 - Issue 9 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.9.9 Abstract: In every language the beginning of the word begins with subject-predicative structure, and this is a big issue at the global level, which is the focus of many grammar scholars. The narrow-minded comparison of the difference between the Chinese-Kazakh word order, subject-predicative sentence structure in two languages makes students more advantageous. In Chinese-Kazakh languages word order of the subject and object are different, however, approaches of mastering skills are similar. This article deals systematically with the specific features and classification of the Chinese-Kazakh subject-predicative sentence. The Chinese language refers to SVO form, the predicate is compiled according to the features of sentence, which has no morphological changes. In any case “specifics are saved + predicate is stem + the conclusion is saved”. And the Kazakh language refers to the SOV form. The subject, object, adverbial modifier comes before the predicate. Word phrases and word process are formed in the same order. Because auxiliary words and suffixes together form the members of the sentence. Thus, words can change their order, members of the sentence are very flexible. However, the subject and the predicate in two languages do not change. This focused on differences and similarities of the subject-predicative sentence in two languages.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |