Ponte Academic Journal Dec 2020, Volume 76, Issue 12 |
A COMPARATIVE QUALITATIVE STUDY OF THE TYPES OF
TRADITIONAL TREATMENT OF FRACTURES BY TRADITIONAL
HEALTH PRACTITIONERS IN KWAZULU-NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA
AND THE NORTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND:
A SURVEY-BASED STUDY
Author(s): Nireshnee Ramchundar ,Manimbulu Nlooto J. Ponte - Dec 2020 - Volume 76 - Issue 12 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2020.12.12 Abstract: Traditional methods for the treatment of fractures world-wide include the physical manipulation
(resetting) of bones and traditional remedies in various dosage forms. Although traditional
bone-setting is no longer widely practiced in most developed countries, traditional remedies
(plant or animal derived) are still used to treat fractures. Traditional health practitioners
administer a variety of herbal medicines for bone strengthening, pain relieving, inflammation
reduction and speedy recovery of fractures. The aim of this study was to determine the types of
treatment administered for fractures according to Zulu medicine practices in Kwazulu-Natal,
South Africa and Māori medicine practices in the North Island of New Zealand. Traditional
health practitioners who routinely practice in urban, semi-urban and rural areas of three districts
each in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa and in the North Island of New Zealand were surveyed
between October 2018 and September 2019. A mixed method study was conducted by a survey,
and a moderator with a single focus group of three traditional health practitioners, resulting in
qualitative research based on their practices in the management of fractures and fracture-related
injuries. In both South Africa and New Zealand, traditional health practitioners included in this
study practiced in a similar way, mainly as Zulu herbalists or Izinyanga in South Africa (22/26,
84.6%) and as Tohunga-Rongoā or traditional Māori practitioners who are experts in medicine and healing (12/12, 100%) in New Zealand. Although the respondents were mainly Zulu
herbalists in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, four practiced as diviners (Izangoma). Most of the
respondents were male practitioners(20/38, 52.6%) who practiced for 11-20 years (13/26, 50%)
in South Africa and the same length of time in New Zealand (5/12, 41.7%). It was interesting
to note that traditional health practitioners interviewed in this study in both New Zealand and
SA, no longer practiced the manipulation of bones or bone-setting. Rather they used traditional
herbal mixtures with presumed fracture-healing activity. Traditional health practitioners
surveyed in this study identified 47 traditional medicines from South Africa and 27 traditional
medicines from New Zealand with presumed fracture-healing activity. The formulae for
preparing these traditional medicines were documented. Traditional medicine preparations of
Umhlabelo (Talinum caffrum) and Umahlanganisa (Drimia delagoensis) in South Africa, and
Harakeke (Phormium tenax) and Tutu (Coriaria arborea) in New Zealand were most
prescribed by traditional health practitioners to treat fractures. The use of a support structure
for fractures to limit mobility (and prevent further injury) and promote healing by Zulu
traditional health practitioners should be encouraged. Further investigation is warranted on the
phytochemical compositions of the two most commonly used herbal mixtures identified above,
each in South Africa and New Zealand.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |