Ponte Academic Journal Sep 2018, Volume 74, Issue 9 |
ALGEBRA IN TEXTBOOKS: A COMPARISON OF SOUTH AFRICAN\r\nAND ANGOLAN TEXTBOOKS Author(s): Vimolan Mudaly ,Isabel Pedro J. Ponte - Sep 2018 - Volume 74 - Issue 9 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2018.9.5 Abstract: This study compares the algebra sections in three textbooks, one South African grade 9, one South African grade 10, and one Angolan grade 10 textbook. The comparison is fourfold. First, I compare the textbooks in terms of topics. Second, I compare the distribution of the text on explanations, examples and exercises. Third, I use the levels of understanding of algebraic expressions suggested by Sfard and Linchevski (1994) to interrogate progression and consistency of the texts. And finally, I look at the number of steps required to move from task to solution in the examples and exercises, providing a different measure of progression. The data shows that the Angolan textbook has more explanations than the South African textbooks, and far fewer exercises. However, the progression both in terms of levels of understanding of algebraic expressions and in terms of the number of steps required to solve tasks is swifter in the Angolan textbook. Also, there is less focus on symbol manipulation in the Angolan textbook. Though much depends on the ways in which textbooks are used in the classroom, this suggests that the Angolan textbook offers the learners more opportunities to learn.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |