Ponte Academic Journal Nov 2016, Volume 72, Issue 11 |
ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES THROUGH THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING Author(s): Arita Marini J. Ponte - Nov 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 11 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.11.34 Abstract: The purpose of this research is to enhance student learning outcomes through the use of contextual teaching and learning. The method of this research is the action research done in class outlined as Kemmis and McTaggart. This model is a dynamic process describing improvement in a spiral of steps composing of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The result shows that there was an increase of arithmetic mean test scores from 61.5 in cycle 1 to 67.2 in cycle 2 with t test= 2.114. Due to this result was still lower than the target, so the research was continued to the cycle 3. There were also learning gains from 67.2 in cycle 2 to 76.2 in cycle 3. This result is higher than the desired success target with t test= 3.267 showing that it is statistically significant at the 0.05 level. It can be concluded that student learning outcomes can be enhanced through the use of contextual teaching and learning. Application of contextual teaching and learning in teaching and learning process can give the opportunities for the students to express their ideas freely, have creative thinking, and use their knowledge comprehensively so that the student learning outcomes will be increasing.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |