Ponte Academic Journal Dec 2016, Volume 72, Issue 12 |
DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT: A MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRET AND CAPTURE L2 LISTENING COMPREHENSION DEVELOPMENT Author(s): Puyan Taheri J. Ponte - Dec 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 12 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.12.2 Abstract: Grounded in Vygotsky�s socio-cultural theory (SCT) of cognitive development (Vygotsky, 1978), this study seeks to reconcile the assessment and instruction dualism and integrate them to a single unified entity. Dynamic Assessment (DA) allows the teacher/mediator to capture and develop both the actual and potential zones of the development. Twenty eight TEFL students, ranging in age from 18 to 20, at Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU) participated in this study. Microgenetic analysis, a key sociocultural method, and idea unit analysis were used to reveal the frequency and quality of mediational moves across the assessment sessions. The findings of the study indicate that, through interactions in the zone of proximal Development, DA allows not only to establish the actual level of learners� listening ability but also to diagnose/assess the potential level of their listening comprehension, while at the same time promoting their comprehension. The analysis of the DA-based interactions led to the generation of an a posteriori list of mediational strategies considered useful for classroom-based assessment and instruction. Finally, this study advocates the application of DA procedure in instruction and assessment contexts to provide a more valid assessment of L2 learners� listening proficiency and promotion of abilities in the state of ripening.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |