Ponte Academic Journal Apr 2017, Volume 73, Issue 4 |
ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF IMPROVED SWEET-POTATO (Ipomoea batatas LAM.) LINES IN SOME SELECTED LOCATIONS OF KANO STATE, NIGERIA Author(s): S. U. Yahaya ,B. M. Auwalu, A Lado, S. U. Abdulkadir, J. Njoku J. Ponte - Apr 2017 - Volume 73 - Issue 4 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.4.47 Abstract: An on-farm adaptive trial was conducted at five locations in Kano State, Nigeria, to assess the adaptability of some improved sweet-potato lines with a view to harness their potentials in reducing the demand deficit in the study areas. Treatments consisted of ten improved sweet-potato lines and a local (Dan-china) as check. These were evaluated for growth, yield traits and root yield. Randomized Complete Block Design was used. Results of the study revealed significant (p˂ 0.05) differences among lines in days to maturity and vine length. Similarly, the lines differed significantly in mean root weight, root length, root diameter, vine weight and root yield. These traits were in most cases higher in King J and Dan-china. Response of the lines to all the traits were significant in all locations except for days to maturity indicating that is genetically controlled. Kibiya out-performed all other locations in all the measured traits. The research revealed that al the lines have potentials for increased root yield particularly if the production period could be extended such that optimal precipitation coincides with root formation and root bulking stages.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |