Ponte Academic Journal Sep 2016, Volume 72, Issue 9 |
COORDINATION OF SCHOOL FURNITURE IN SCIENCE TEACHING WITH PUPILS`S DIMENSIONS DURING PREADOLESCENT Author(s): Natasa Rizman Herga ,Samo Fosnaric J. Ponte - Sep 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 9 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.9.26 Abstract: The aim of the research was to identify adequacy of school furniture dimensions with the help of anthropometric measurements experimented on 11 - 12 year-olds. These are the pupils who have switched from classroom teaching to the subject teaching and have lessons in specialized classrooms, which are designed for a specific school subject. We were interested in the discrepancies between pupils' anthropometric dimensions and the dimensions of school furniture situated in science classrooms. The research included 192 pupils (N = 192) in the 6th and 7th grade of primary schools in North-Eastern Slovenia. Readings were made on certain pupils' anthropometric dimensions including stature, popliteal height, buttock-popliteal length, elbow height sitting, thigh thickness, subscapular height and hip width. Measured children's anthropometric dimensions were compared with the dimensions of desks and chairs used by pupils. The research has showed a great mismatch of school furniture with anthropometric dimensions which can have serious consequences on pupils development. It is recommended that school furniture may be acceptable if they are issued in at least three different sizes and that schools actively promote appropriate dynamic in physical behaviour in classrooms.
Key words: anthropometry; mismatches; primary school; science classroom furniture.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |