Ponte Academic Journal Mar 2016, Volume 72, Issue 3 |
Chinas One Belt & One Silk Road Initiative: A Theoretical Perspective Author(s): Aasia Khatoon Khattak J. Ponte - Mar 2016 - Volume 72 - Issue 3 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2016.3.17 Abstract: Abstract
The aim of this theoretical research paper is to develop the better understanding to the research subject by defining its analytical part by the theory of the international Relations subject. The theories are the core part of the International Relations subject that are used mostly for the better explanations of prevailing world political trends. The theories are developing better understanding to the subject of International Relations. In International Relations discourse, often many events, plans and actions brings broader consequences and changes in the relations among the countries, in world political trends and in world global order. China through One Belt and One Road Initiative is creating a new zone of power, establishing a multipolar world and introducing a new world order of interdependence, peace and cooperation. The paper is analyzing the China�s One Belt and One Road with perspective of changing political, economic and social trends. The analytical part of the subject is analyzed further under the paradigms and framework of the theory. The theory that is used here is neoliberalism.
Key-words: Chinas One Belt One Road Initiative, Neo-liberalism, Emerging New World Order.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |