Ponte Academic Journal Aug 2017, Volume 73, Issue 8 |
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN IN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL SAFETY Author(s): Seilbek Asanov ,Malik Augan, Yermek Chukubayev J. Ponte - Aug 2017 - Volume 73 - Issue 8 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.8.11 Abstract: The rationale of the research is caused by the fact that definition of the national border between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan is a serious problem due to various reasons. The Central Asian Region acts as a buffer zone protecting the southern frontiers of the CIS and weakening of this section may threaten the stability of the situation. Due to this fact this article is aimed at revealing of the ways of cooperation and strengthening of the relationships between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. In this context exactly the relationships between the states acts as the basis of stability in Central Asia. The paper reveals cooperation in the sphere of foreign policy of the two key republics of Central Asia. The materials of the paper represent practical utility for further development of relationships between Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan as well as for the international relations in Central Asia. It seems to be reasonable for Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, the two largest states in the region, to intensify their joint efforts for implementation of a series of integration projects in Central Asia with the purpose of achievement of stability in two- and multisided relations.
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |